About Abortion Are You Pregnant? Professional Education Publications and Research U.S. Public Policy Canada Membership Support NAF About NAF
 Find a Provider | News | Blog | Get Involved | Action Alerts | Clinicians for Choice | En español | En français | Site Map | Contact Us | NAF Home
NAF Logo news We provide the medical and political perspectives on abortion care and policy.
NewsPress kit
Press kit
Press releases
> Press Release Archive
 
Interview Experts
Search prochoice.org
Powered by
Google
NAF Hotline
1-800-772-9100
Find a provider:
1-877-257-0012

(no funding assistance provided on this line)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 6, 2003

CONTACTS

NAF Communications Department
202-667-5881
ACLU
212-549-2634

 

Acting to Protect Women's Health and Rights, Court Blocks Federal Abortion Ban

New York - Recognizing that the first-ever federal ban on safe abortion procedures is a sweeping and dangerous measure, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York blocked its enforcement today.

"We are pleased that the court acted quickly to protect women and their doctors," said Vicki Saporta, President and CEO of the National Abortion Federation (NAF). "Allowing Congress to practice medicine without a license endangers the lives and health of women. We need to ensure that medical decisions are made by experienced and qualified medical professionals. Thankfully, the court understood the gravity of the situation and stopped this law from taking effect."

NAF is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union in its challenge to the so-called "Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003" recently enacted by Congress.

Since 1995, similar bans on safe abortion procedures have been enacted in more than half the states and challenged in courts throughout the country. Courts considering these laws - including the United States Supreme Court just three years ago - have consistently struck down the bans because they prohibit a range of safe abortion procedures used well before fetal viability and they endanger women's health.

"Today's ruling confirms that it was reprehensible for lawmakers to push through a ban that will harm women in need of critical medical care," said Louise Melling, Director of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project. "By refusing to include a health exception, lawmakers demonstrated that they are willing to trade women's health and to flout the Constitution for political gain."

Today's case is National Abortion Federation v. Ashcroft, No. 03 CV 8695. Lawyers on the case include Talcott Camp of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project; Rebekah Diller of the New York Civil Liberties Union; Lorie Chaiten of the ACLU of Illinois; and Kimberly A. Parker of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering.

> More information on NAF's lawsuit against the federal ban on abortion practice

###

The National Abortion Federation is the professional association of abortion providers in the U.S. and Canada dedicated to ensuring that abortion remains safe, legal and accessible.
www.prochoice.org

The ACLU has successfully challenged so-called "partial-birth abortion" bans throughout the U.S., including bans in Alaska, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, notably winning the first case in the nation to invalidate a state ban.

NAF website Copyright 2010 National Abortion Federation. Use of this site signifies your agreement to our Usage and Privacy Policy.