About Abortion Are You Pregnant? Professional Education Publications and Research U.S. Public Policy Canada Membership Support NAF About NAF
 Find a Provider | News | Blog | Get Involved | Action Alerts | Clinicians for Choice | En español | En français | Site Map | Contact Us | NAF Home
NAF Logo news We provide the medical and political perspectives on abortion care and policy.
NewsPress kit
Press kit
Press releases
> Press Release Archive
Interview Experts
Search prochoice.org
Powered by
Google
NAF Hotline
1-800-772-9100
Find a provider:
1-877-257-0012

(no funding assistance provided on this line)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

CONTACT:

NAF Communications Department
202-667-5881

ACLU and National Abortion Federation Hail Two Appeals Court Rulings Holding Federal Abortion Ban Unconstitutional

NEW YORK - The National Abortion Federation (NAF) and the American Civil Liberties Union today praised two rulings holding the "Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003" unconstitutional. The decisions came out of federal appeals courts in New York and California. These rulings join an Eighth Circuit decision holding the ban unconstitutional.

"We are pleased that both courts have recognized that this ban needs an exception to protect women's health," said Vicki Saporta, NAF President and CEO. "Doctors and women should be able to make medical decisions free from interference by politicians."

In the Second Circuit ruling in New York, the court affirmed that the ban requires a health exception and asked for further legal briefing to determine how to remedy the violation. The Ninth Circuit in California affirmed the lower court decision striking down the ban.

"Every court to have considered this ban has recognized that abortion laws must include protections for women's health," said Talcott Camp, Deputy Director of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project. "Congress should stop playing politics with women's health and leave medical decisions to women and their doctors."

The Second Circuit case, NAF v. Gonzales, was brought by NAF and seven individual physicians represented by the ACLU, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, ACLU of Illinois, and the New York Civil Liberties Union. The Ninth Circuit case was brought by Planned Parenthood Federation of America ( Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Gonzales) on behalf of Planned Parenthood affiliates throughout the country. In July 2005, the Eighth Circuit affirmed a lower court's ruling striking down the ban in a challenge brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights (Carhart v. Gonzales). The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to hear that case.

Congress passed the federal ban despite numerous court decisions, including a decision in 2000 by the Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart, striking down similar state bans. Courts have consistently struck down the bans for two reasons: their broad language prohibits abortions as early as 13 weeks in pregnancy, and they lack exceptions to protect women's health.

The National Abortion Federation (NAF) is the professional association of abortion providers in the United States and Canada. Our mission is to ensure safe, legal, and accessible abortion care to promote health and justice for women. Our members include health care professionals at clinics, doctors' offices, and hospitals, who together care for more than half the women in both countries who choose abortion each year.

The ACLU is our nation's guardian of liberty, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.

For more information, visit: http://www.aclu.org/ReproductiveRights/ReproductiveRightslist.cfm?c=148 and http://prochoice.org/policy/issues/federal_ban.html

###

NAF website Copyright 2010 National Abortion Federation. Use of this site signifies your agreement to our Usage and Privacy Policy.